Bringing doctors together

or

A free, private network for verified physicians

Leading voices

Dr. Brahmajee Nallamothu

Interventional Cardiology · UMHS

View

Dr. Mohamad Adnan Alkhouli

Interventional Cardiology · Mayo Clinic College of Medicine

View

Dr. Manesh Patel

Interventional Cardiology · Duke University

View

Dr. Deepak Bhatt

Interventional Cardiology · Mount Sinai

View

Dr. Sunil Rao

Interventional Cardiology · NYU Langone

View

Dr. Alexander Fanaroff

Interventional Cardiology · UPenn

View

Dr. James Tcheng

Interventional Cardiology · Duke

View

Dr. Pinak Shah

Interventional Cardiology · PHS

View

Dr. Dorairaj Prabhakaran

General Cardiology

View

Dr. Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman

EP · Geisinger

View
  • Discover your community

  • Stay current

  • A profile that represents you

  • Find your people

About RoonPrivacyTerms

    Overview

    Impact of CKD and Hemodialysis on Treatment of Severely Calcified Lesions: The ECLIPSE Trial.

    Nov 2, 2026DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.126.017556Journal ArticleAHA

    Written by: Pratheesh GeorgeKrishna Santosh VemuriRichard A ShlofmitzSuhail DohadThom DahleAndres M PinedaKendrick A ShunkCarlye KraemerPhilippe GénéreuxAjay J KirtaneGregg W Stone

    Find these authors on Roon

    AK
    Dr. Ajay Kirtane
    Interventional Cardiology · CUIMC

    Summary

    Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and coronary calcification increase risk for adverse events following drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. We evaluated whether outcomes following vessel preparation with orbital atherectomy (OA) versus balloon angioplasty (BA) vary according to CKD. Methods: This pre-specified CKD sub-analysis of the prospective, multicenter ECLIPSE trial evaluated 2,001 patients with severely calcified lesions randomized to OA versus BA prior to DES. Independent predictors of two-year target-vessel failure (TVF)-a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (ID-TVR)-were determined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: CKD (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m² or hemodialysis) was present in 694 (34.7%) patients; 112 required hemodialysis. Two-year TVF was significantly higher with versus without CKD (21.2% vs. 11.6%; p<0.001), driven by increased cardiac death and ID-TVR. Hemodialysis independently predicted TVF (adjusted HR 2.14, 95% CI 1.30-3.53; p=0.003), whereas reduced eGFR alone did not (p=0.070). In patients on hemodialysis, OA versus BA was associated with higher rates of TVF (52.3% vs. 30.7%; adjusted HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.16-5.41; P=0.020), driven by higher rates of TV-MI and ID-TVR, whereas TVF was similar after OA versus BA in patients not on hemodialysis (13.5% vs. 13.1%; adjusted HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.81-1.35; P=0.730); however, the interaction between treatment assignment and hemodialysis status was not significant (Pint=0.244). Conclusions: CKD remains a major predictor of adverse outcomes after DES implantation in severely calcified lesions, with the highest risks in patients on hemodialysis. In the ECLIPSE trial, higher two-year rates of TVF were observed after vessel preparation with OA compared with BA in patients on hemodialysis but not in patients with CKD not on hemodialysis or in those without CKD. Given the modest hemodialysis subgroup size and non-significant interaction testing, confirmation of these findings in additional studies is warranted.
    AKDr. Ajay Kirtane
    Leading Voice

    Dr. Ajay Kirtane

    Cardiology · Interventional Cardiology
    Columbia University Irving Medical Center
    ajay
    New York City, NY, USA