Bringing doctors together

or

A free, private network for verified physicians

  • Discover your community

  • Stay current

  • A profile that represents you

  • Find your people

About RoonPrivacyTerms

    Overview

    Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel for Patients Undergoing Endovascular Flow Diversion for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Multicenter Investigation.

    Sep 2, 2026DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a9257Journal ArticleAJNR

    Written by: Huanwen ChenDhairya A LakhaniMarco ColasurdoAjay MalhotraDheeraj Gandhi

    Find these authors on Roon

    DL
    Dr. Dhairya Lakhani
    Neuroradiology · WVU

    Summary

    BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Dual antiplatelet therapy is essential for patients undergoing flow diversion (FD) for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA), but the optimal P2Y12 inhibitor, particularly ticagrelor versus clopidogrel, remains controversial. This study aims to assess the comparative effectiveness of ticagrelor and clopidogrel for patients undergoing FD treatment for UIAs.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective propensity score matched analysis using the TrinetX platform, which contains a multicenter database of real-world clinical records. Adult patients with UIA (ICD-10-CM: I67.1) who underwent FD and were initiated on either ticagrelor or clopidogrel within 14 days before to 3 days after FD placement were included. The primary end point was ischemic stroke, and secondary end points included major hemorrhage (intracranial hemorrhage [ICH] or hospitalization requiring blood transfusion), ICH, and all-cause mortality at 180 days. Propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare outcomes between groups.RESULTS: The study included 2976 patients (1047 ticagrelor, 1929 clopidogrel). After propensity score matching, 963 patients remained in each group. At 180 days, ischemic stroke rates were similar between the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups (1.3% versus 1.3%, P = 1.00; hazard ratio [HR], 1.00 [95% CI 0.45-2.23]). Major hemorrhage rates were numerically higher for ticagrelor patients (2.4% versus 2.0%, P = .52; HR, 1.23 [95% CI, 0.66-2.28]), as were ICH rates (1.4% versus 0.8%, P = .18; HR, 1.86 [95% CI, 0.74-4.67]). All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the ticagrelor group (1.7% versus 0.6%, P = .025; HR, 3.01 [95% CI, 1.10-8.29]).CONCLUSIONS: In real-world practice, ticagrelor and clopidogrel for patients undergoing FD were equivalent in terms of ischemic stroke and hemorrhage risks, though ticagrelor was associated with a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality.
    DLDr. Dhairya Lakhani

    Dr. Dhairya Lakhani

    Radiology · Neuroradiology
    West Virginia University
    dhairya