Bringing doctors together

or

A free, private network for verified physicians

Leading voices

Dr. Shashank Sinha

Advanced Heart Failure · Inova Fairfax Hospital

View

Dr. Javed Butler

Advanced Heart Failure · Baylor Health Care System

View

Dr. Andrew Sauer

Advanced Heart Failure · Saint Luke's

View

Dr. Anu Lala

Advanced Heart Failure · Mount Sinai

View

Dr. Sunny Varshney

Advanced Heart Failure · Stanford

View

Dr. Stephanie Hsiao

Advanced Heart Failure · Stanford

View

Dr. Michelle Kittleson

Advanced Heart Failure · Cedars-Sinai

View

Dr. Adrian Hernandez

Advanced Heart Failure · Duke

View

Dr. Dorairaj Prabhakaran

General Cardiology

View

Dr. Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman

EP · Geisinger

View
  • Discover your community

  • Stay current

  • A profile that represents you

  • Find your people

About RoonPrivacyTerms

    Overview

    Assessing Benefit in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Analysis of the VICTORIA Trial Using Novel Prognostic Risk Stratification.

    Aug 28, 2025DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2025.07.024Journal ArticleJCF

    Written by: Christopher M O'ConnorSarah RathwellDevan V MehrotraStefano CordaCiaran J McMULLANCarolyn S P LamJustin A EzekowitzBurkert PiekseAdrian F HernandezKevin J AnstromRobert J MentzChristopher R DefilippiAdriaan VoorsPiotr PonikowskiJaved ButlerCynthia M WesterhoutPaul W ArmstrongVICTORIA Study Group

    Find these authors on Roon

    RM
    Dr. Robert Mentz
    Advanced Heart Failure · Duke University

    Summary

    BACKGROUND: Randomized trials remain the standard for evaluating novel therapies. Primary endpoint(s) risk heterogeneity and may dilute treatment efficacy. The 5-step Stratified Testing and Amalgamation Routine (5-STAR) methodology helps to address these limitations. We applied this methodology to the original VICTORIA (VerICiguaT Global Study in Subjects With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction) database and enriched it by relevant ancillary information.METHODS: Elastic net Cox regression and a conditional inference-tree tool blinded to treatment assignment partitioned the population into risk strata for endpoints based on baseline covariates strongly associated with outcomes. Core laboratory biomarkers and baseline electrocardiographic variables were available covariates. After unblinding, treatments were compared for the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH) within each risk stratum: stratum-level results were averaged for overall inference.RESULTS: The 5-STAR analysis revealed greater vericiguat efficacy pooled on the primary composite endpoint than the original VICTORIA analysis (5-STAR HR, 95% CI: 0.85, 0.77-0.94 vs 0.90, 0.82-0.98), and its components (5-STAR HR, 95% CI: cardiovascular death: 0.79, 0.67-0.93 vs 0.93, 0.81-1.06; HFH: 0.89, 0.79-1.00 vs 0.90, 0.81-1.00). Five biomarkers (GDF-15, NT-proBNP, albumin, blood urea nitrogen, and uric acid) determined the risk strata across the 3 endpoints.CONCLUSIONS: The 5-STAR methodology attenuates the dilution of treatment effects inherent in conventional prognostic risk heterogeneity. This retrospective analysis of VICTORIA revealed greater efficacy of vericiguat on the primary endpoint and its components. GDF-15 was consistently the strongest prognostic risk factor across the composite endpoint and its components.
    RMDr. Robert Mentz
    Leading Voice

    Dr. Robert Mentz

    Cardiology · Advanced Heart Failure & Transplantation
    Duke University
    robertm
    Durham, NC, USA