Bringing doctors together

or

A free, private network for verified physicians

Leading voices

Dr. Reza Manesh

Hospital Medicine · Greater Los Angeles VA

View

Dr. Michael Calavano

Hospital Medicine · NYP Weill Cornell

View

Dr. Nasim Afsar

Hospital Medicine

View

Dr. Sara Murray

Hospital Medicine · Johns Hopkins Medicine

View

Dr. Robert Korom

Hospital Medicine · Penda Health

View

Dr. Sunil Kripalani

Hospital Medicine · VUMC

View

Dr. Moises Auron

Hospital Medicine · Cleveland Clinic

View

Dr. Rahul Ganatra

Hospital Medicine · Harvard Medical School

View

Dr. Robert Wachter

Hospital Medicine · UCSF

View

Dr. Tony Breu

Hospital Medicine · VABHS

View
  • Discover your community

  • Stay current

  • A profile that represents you

  • Find your people

About RoonPrivacyTerms

    Overview

    Improving Sepsis Outcomes in the Era of Pay-for-Performance and Electronic Quality Measures: A Joint IDSA/ACEP/PIDS/SHEA/SHM/SIDP Position Paper.

    Mar 20, 2024DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciad447Journal ArticleCID

    Written by: Chanu RheeJeffrey R StrichKathleen ChiotosDavid C ClassenSara E CosgroveRon GreenoEmily L HeilSameer S KadriAndre C KalilDavid N GilbertHenry MasurEdward J SeptimusDaniel A SweeneyAisha TerryDean L WinslowDonald M YealyMichael Klompas

    Find these authors on Roon

    RG
    Dr. Ronald Greeno
    Hospital Medicine · Society of Hospital Medicine

    Summary

    The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced the Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) as a pay-for-reporting measure in 2015 and is now planning to make it a pay-for-performance measure by incorporating it into the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program. This joint IDSA/ACEP/PIDS/SHEA/SHM/SIPD position paper highlights concerns with this change. Multiple studies indicate that SEP-1 implementation was associated with increased broad-spectrum antibiotic use, lactate measurements, and aggressive fluid resuscitation for patients with suspected sepsis but not with decreased mortality rates. Increased focus on SEP-1 risks further diverting attention and resources from more effective measures and comprehensive sepsis care. We recommend retiring SEP-1 rather than using it in a payment model and shifting instead to new sepsis metrics that focus on patient outcomes. CMS is developing a community-onset sepsis 30-day mortality electronic clinical quality measure (eCQM) that is an important step in this direction. The eCQM preliminarily identifies sepsis using systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, antibiotic administrations or diagnosis codes for infection or sepsis, and clinical indicators of acute organ dysfunction. We support the eCQM but recommend removing SIRS criteria and diagnosis codes to streamline implementation, decrease variability between hospitals, maintain vigilance for patients with sepsis but without SIRS, and avoid promoting antibiotic use in uninfected patients with SIRS. We further advocate for CMS to harmonize the eCQM with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Adult Sepsis Event surveillance metric to promote unity in federal measures, decrease reporting burden for hospitals, and facilitate shared prevention initiatives. These steps will result in a more robust measure that will encourage hospitals to pay more attention to the full breadth of sepsis care, stimulate new innovations in diagnosis and treatment, and ultimately bring us closer to our shared goal of improving outcomes for patients.
    RGDr. Ronald Greeno
    Leading Voice

    Dr. Ronald Greeno

    Internal Medicine · Hospital Medicine
    Society of Hospital Medicine
    ron
    Los Angeles, CA